切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (03) : 157 -161. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2012.03.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

经肝门板半肝阻断在肝细胞肝癌切除术中的应用研究
李清汉1, 甄作均1,(), 陈应军1, 陈焕伟1, 计勇1   
  1. 1. 528000 广东,佛山市第一人民医院肝脏胰腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-07 出版日期:2012-12-10
  • 通信作者: 甄作均

Application of hemihepatic vascular occlusion through hilar plate in resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

Qing-han LI1, Zuo-jun ZHEN1,(), Ying-jun CHEN1, Huan-wei CHEN1, Yong JI1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatic Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China
  • Received:2012-08-07 Published:2012-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Zuo-jun ZHEN
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: ZHEN Zuo-jun, Email:
引用本文:

李清汉, 甄作均, 陈应军, 陈焕伟, 计勇. 经肝门板半肝阻断在肝细胞肝癌切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2012, 01(03): 157-161.

Qing-han LI, Zuo-jun ZHEN, Ying-jun CHEN, Huan-wei CHEN, Yong JI. Application of hemihepatic vascular occlusion through hilar plate in resection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2012, 01(03): 157-161.

目的

探讨经肝门板半肝阻断在肝细胞肝癌(肝癌)切除术中的应用价值。

方法

本组回顾性研究对象为2007年6月至2012年6月在广东佛山市第一人民医院行肝癌切除术的72例患者。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。按肝血流阻断方法将患者分为经肝门板半肝血流阻断组(半肝阻断组)和Pringle肝门血流阻断组(Pringle组)。半肝阻断组30例,男性25例,女性5例,中位年龄42岁;手术方式包括左半肝切除术8例,左外叶切除术2例,右半肝切除术12例,肝右前叶切除术3例,肝右后叶切除术5例。Pringle组42例,男性35例,女性7例,中位年龄45岁;手术方式包括左半肝切除术11例,肝左外叶切除术3例,右半肝切除术18例,肝右前叶切除术2例,右后叶切除术8例。记录手术时间、肝门阻断时间,术中出血量及术后住院时间,观察术后1、3、7 d血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、白蛋白(ALB)、总胆红素(TB)的变化及术后出血、肝衰竭、胆漏、腹水等并发症及死亡发生情况。采用t检验比较两组手术时间、肝门阻断时间、术中出血量、术后肝功能及术后住院时间的差异。

结果

半肝阻断组和Pringle组患者手术时间分别为(221±51)min和(211±41)min,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.576,P=0.122);半肝阻断组患者肝门阻断时间为(34.5±3.4)min,明显长于Pringle组的(24.0±2.5)min(t=2.541,P=0.015);半肝阻断组和Pringle组患者术中出血量分别为(466±91)ml和(403±80)ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.013,P=0.331)。半肝阻断组患者术后1、3、7 d的血清ALB高于Pringle组,ALT、TB低于Pringle组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。半肝阻断组术后住院时间为(6.7±1.3)d,Pringle组为(8.5±2.6)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.447,P=0.018)。两组均无发生手术相关死亡及出血、肝衰竭等严重并发症。Pringle组术后1例发生胆漏,21 d后才拔除引流管,治愈;1例术后出现大量腹水,予以补充人血白蛋白及利尿治疗后消失。

结论

在肝癌切除术中应用经肝门板半肝血流阻断具有肝功能损害轻、术后恢复快、并发症发生率低等优点,是一种安全、有效的控制肝脏血流的方法。

Objective

To investigate the application value of hemihepatic vascular occlusion through hilar plate during hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted in 72 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy from June 2007 to June 2012 in the First People’s Hospital of Foshan. Local ethical committee approval had been received and that the informed consent of all participating subjects was obtained. All the patients were divided into hemihepatic occlusion group and Pringle maneuver group according to the method of vascular occlusion. Thirty cases(25 male, 5 female, mean age of 42 years) were included in the hemihepatic occlusion group, in which, hepatectomy was performed on the left half liver(n=8), left lateral lobes (n=2), right lobe(n=12), right anterior lobes (n=3), right posterior lobes (n=5), respectively. Forty-two cases(35 male, 7 female, mean age of 45 years) were included in the Pringle maneuver group, in which, hepatectomy was performed on the left half liver (n=11), left lateral lobes (n=3), right half liver(n=18), right anterior lobes (n=2), right posterior lobes (n=8), respectively. The time of operation, porta hepatis clamping, blood loss during operation, postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Alanine aminotransferase(ALT), albumin(ALB) and total bilirubin(TB) on day 1, 3, and 7 after operation were monitored. Mortality and postoperative complications including hemorrhage, hepatic failure, bile leakage and seroperitoneum were also detected. The t test was made to compare the difference between two groups in the time of operation, porta hepatis clamping, blood loss during operation, postoperative hepatic function and hospital stay.

Results

The operation time of the hemihepatic occlusion group and Pringle maneuver group were (221±51) min and (211±41) min respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (t=1.576, P=0.122) . The time of porta hepatis clamping in the hemihepatic occlusion group was (34.5±3.4) min, which was evidently longer than that of the Pringle maneuver group was (24.0±2.5) min (t=2.541, P=0.015). The blood loss during operation in two groups were (466±91) ml and (403±80) ml respectively. There was no significant difference (t=1.013, P=0.331) . The ALB on day 1, 3, and 7 after operation in the hemihepatic occlusion group were higher than that in the Pringle maneuver group while the ALT, TB were lower than those in the Pringle maneuver group. There was no significant difference between two groups (all in P<0.05). The hospital stay in two groups were (6.7±1.3) d and (8.5±2.6) d, which demonstrated significant difference (t=2.447, P=0.018) . No mortality, hemorrhage or hepatic failure was found in two groups. One case in the Pringle maneuver group suffered bile leakage after the operation and were cured by removing the drainage tube 21 days later. And 1 case suffered massive ascites and recovered by the use of albumin and diuretics.

Conclusions

The hemihepatic vascular occlusion through hilar plate in hepatectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma is a safe and effective technique for controlling the hepatic blood flow, with the advantage of less damage to liver function, quick recovery after operation and low incidence of complicatons.

表1 半肝阻断组和Pringle组患者手术情况比较(±s
表2 半肝阻断组和Pringle组患者术前及术后不同时间肝功能变化比较(±s
[1]
严律南,曾勇,林琦远,等.半肝血流阻断下肝能量代谢变化的研究.中华肝胆外科杂志, 2000, 6(1):10-12.
[2]
严律南,袁朝新,张肇达,等.应用半肝血流阻断行肝叶切除术29例报告.中华外科杂志, 1994, 32(1):35-36.
[3]
Makuuchi M, Mori T, Gunvén P, et al. Safety of hemihepatic vascular occlusion during resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1987, 164(2):155-158.
[4]
陈孝平,张志伟.常温下肝门阻断对肝细胞功能的影响.肝胆外科杂志, 1995, 3(1):6-7.
[5]
吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M]. 4版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 1986: 1198-1220.
[6]
吴孟超,陈汉,张晓华,等.外科治疗原发性肝癌1102例.第二军医大学学报, 1993, 14(3):201-204.
[7]
汤钊猷,余业勤,周信达,等. 1450例原发性肝癌的外科治疗.中华外科杂志, 1992, 30(6):325-328.
[8]
李基业,WeglinskiKupiec.钙蛋白酶与肝移植缺血再灌注损伤关系的实验研究.中华肝胆外科杂志, 2002, 8(5):287-289.
[9]
Chau GY, Lui WY, King KL, et al. Evaluation of effect of hemihepatic vascular occlusion and the Pringle maneuver during hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and impaired liver function. World J Surg, 2005, 29(11):1374-1383.
[10]
夏锋,王曙光,别平,等. Pringle法导致的肝脏缺血再灌注损伤对肝癌肝切除患者预后的影响.中华消化外科杂志, 2009, 8(2):103-106.
[11]
乔治,李荣,黎沾良,等.半肝与全肝入肝血流阻断下肝切除术后肠道细菌易位影响对比研究.中国实用外科杂志, 2008, 28(10):878-879.
[12]
Kaneko H, Tamura A, Ishii T, et al. Bacterial translocation in small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury and efficacy of Anti-CINC antibody treatment. Eur Surg Res, 2007, 39(3):153-159.
[13]
Fu SY, Lau WY, Li GG, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg, 2011, 201(1):62-69.
[14]
严律南.肝门板及其在肝胆外科的应用.中国普外基础与临床杂志, 1998, 5(4):239.
[15]
Lau WY, Lai EC, Lau SH. Methods of vascular control technique during liver resection: a comprehensive review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2010, 9(5):473-481.
[16]
孔凡民,董明,田雨霖.肝门板分离技术在肝胆外科手术中的应用.中国实用外科杂志, 2008, 28(2):151-152.
[17]
刘允怡.肝切除与肝移植应用解剖学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2010: 27-34.
[18]
范国勇,甄作均,陈焕伟,等.腹腔镜经肝门板半肝血流阻断在左半肝切除中的应用[J/CD].消化肿瘤杂志:电子版, 2011, 3(2):78-81.
[19]
刘鹏熙,吕新生,韩明,等.肝门阻断后细菌及内毒素移位的研究.中华实验外科杂志, 1997, 14(1):32-33.
[20]
Liu DL, Jeppsson B, Hakansson CH, et al. Multiple- system organ damage resulting from prolonged hepatic inflow interruption. Arch Surg, 1996, 131(4):442-447.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[13] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?