切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 219 -225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.02.012

临床研究

互联网+ERAS信息化系统在肝癌患者术后加速康复中的应用
魏海鸽1, 游川1,(), 龚财芳1, 李晓琴1, 邹小红2   
  1. 1 637000 四川省南充市,川北医学院附属医院肝胆外一科
    2 637000 四川省南充市,川北医学院附属医院信息中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-05 出版日期:2026-04-10
  • 通信作者: 游川
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(省院省校合作项目)(2024YFHZ0052); 四川省卫生健康委员会科技项目(临床研究专项)(23LCYJ033)

Application of Internet + ERAS information system in enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with liver cancer

Haige Wei1, Chuan You1,(), Caifang Gong1, Xiaoqin Li1, Xiaohong Zou2   

  1. 1 Department Ⅰ of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
    2 Information Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Received:2025-09-05 Published:2026-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Chuan You
引用本文:

魏海鸽, 游川, 龚财芳, 李晓琴, 邹小红. 互联网+ERAS信息化系统在肝癌患者术后加速康复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 219-225.

Haige Wei, Chuan You, Caifang Gong, Xiaoqin Li, Xiaohong Zou. Application of Internet + ERAS information system in enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with liver cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(02): 219-225.

目的

构建互联网+加速康复外科(ERAS)信息化系统,探讨该系统在肝癌患者术后加速康复中应用价值,为医院外科康复信息化管理提出科学、高效的方案。

方法

回顾性分析2023年1月至12月川北医学院附属医院收治的87例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男53例,女34例;平均年龄(55±8)岁。本研究已经获得伦理委员会批准。2023年1月至6月患者采用常规护理干预设为常规组(n=50),2023年7月至12月采用互联网+ERAS信息化系统患者设为ERAS组(n=37)。互联网+ERAS信息化系统包含每日措施提醒、临床决策以及信息化闭环三个模块。比较应用前后ERAS护理工作的落实率、患者住院时间及费用的变化、不良反应情况。将常规组和ERAS组患者按照1∶1比例进行倾向性评分匹配(PSM)。两组率的比较采取χ2检验;计量资料比较采取t检验。

结果

PSM后两组均为31例,性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤直径、肝功能Child-Pugh分级、TNM分级、家庭居住地以及家庭收入等一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ERAS组健康宣教、术中保温、多模式镇痛、术后早期活动、导管管理、术后进食落实分别为28、27、28、29、28、29例,常规组相应为21、20、19、22、21、20例,ERAS组康复护理工作落实明显优于常规组(χ2=4.769,4.309,7.123,3.946,4.769,7.884;P<0.05)。ERAS组住院时间、住院费用分别为(10.9±1.2)d、(4.0±1.3)万元,明显低于常规组的(11.7±1.1)d、(4.7±1.3)万元(t=2.688,2.219;P<0.05)。ERAS组不良反应发生率6%(2/31),明显低于常规组的26%(8/31)(χ2=4.292,P<0.05)。

结论

互联网+ERAS信息化系统能提高肝癌患者术后护理工作落实率,缩短住院时间并降低住院费用,减少不良反应发生,为肝癌患者术后加速康复提供有力保障。

Objective

To construct the Internet+enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) information system, explore the application value of this system in ERAS of liver cancer patients and put forward a scientific and efficient regimen for the information management of surgical recovery in hospitals.

Methods

Clinical data of 87 patients with liver cancer admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2023 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 53 patients were male and 34 female, aged (55±8) years on average. This retrospective cohort study has been approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. Patients given with routine nursing intervention from January to June, 2023 were assigned into the routine group, and those receiving Internet+ERAS information system from July to December, 2023 were allocated into the ERAS group. Internet+ERAS information system included three modules: daily measure reminder, clinical decision-making and closed-loop information. The implementation rate, the changes of the length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense, and adverse reactions were compared before and after ERAS nursing care. Patients in the routine and ERAS groups were subject to propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1∶1. The rates between two groups were compared by Chi-square test. Measurement data were statistically compared by t-test.

Results

31 patients were assigned in either of two groups after PSM. No significant differences were observed in baseline data, such as gender, age, BMI, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh score, TNM classification, family residence and family income (all P>0.05). Health education, intraoperative heat preservation, multi-mode analgesia, early postoperative activities, catheter management, and postoperative eating were 28, 27, 28, 29, 28, and 29 cases in the ERAS group, and 21, 20, 19, 22, 21, and 20 cases in the routine group, respectively. The implementation rate of recovery nursing care in the ERAS group was significantly better than that in the routine group (χ2=4.769, 4.309, 7.123, 3.946, 4.769 and 7.884; all P<0.05). The length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense in the ERAS group were (10.9±1.2) d and (4.0±1.3)×104 yuan, significantly lower than (11.7±1.1) d and (4.7±1.3)×104 yuan in the routine group (t=2.688,2.219; both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the ERAS group was 6%(2/31), significantly lower than 26% (8/31) in the routine group (χ2=4.292, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Internet+ERAS information system can improve the implementation rate of postoperative nursing care, shorten the length of hospital stay, lower hospitalization expense and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, providing potent guarantee for ERAS of liver cancer patients.

图1 互联网+ERAS信息化系统临床路径构建 注:a为架构图,b为每日措施提醒流程图,c为临床决策流程图
表1 PSM前后两组一般资料比较
表2 PSM后两组患者护理工作落实情况比较(例)
表3 PSM后两组患者不良事件发生情况比较(例)
[1]
马丽, 张爽, 赵薇, 等. 基于互联网信息化健康教育在肝癌术后患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(9): 1360-1363.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2023.09.018.
[2]
王思潼, 叶志霞, 潘泽亚, 等. 原发性肝癌患者治疗决策辅助平台设计[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志, 2021, 28(2): 129-133.DOI: 10.16770/J.cnki.1008-9985.2021.02.009.
[3]
闫凤霞, 李红. 基于加速康复外科理念的集束化护理策略在原发性肝癌患者中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2022, 41(3): 497-500.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200605-00129.
[4]
张英, 郭敬, 杨凤霞, 等. ERAS理念下护理健康教育路径在腹腔镜肝叶切除围手术期的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 168-171.DOI: 10.12259/j.issn.2095-610X.S20210432.
[5]
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263.DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834.
[6]
Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 77(6): 1598-1606.DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021.
[7]
徐睿锋, 王泓睿, 车云, 等. 《癌症统计数据2025》解读: 中美癌症流行病学特征及长期趋势对比研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2025, 32(4): 442-452.
[8]
肝癌新辅助治疗中国专家共识协作组, 中国研究型医院学会消化外科专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会. 肝癌新辅助治疗中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(12): 1035-1045.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230914-00121.
[9]
王秀静, 张雪雪, 王晓娟. 术后快速康复外科管理对肝癌介入术患者术后恢复、疼痛控制情况、自我护理能力及生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(1): 96-99.DOI: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2022.20.01.26.
[10]
车国卫. 加速康复外科需要与时俱进[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2022, 60(11): 17-22.DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0658.
[11]
朱恒美, 方鲲鹏, 耿利, 等. 加速康复外科在肝癌肝切除术标准化流程中的应用研究[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2023, 44(3): 301-304.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2023.03.019.
[12]
罗韬, 朱子兴, 颜慧静, 等. 加速康复外科理念在原发性肝癌患者围术期的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1274-1276.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200428-00328.
[13]
Laimer J, Höller A, Pichler U, et al. Nutritional status in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(5): 1585.DOI: 10.3390/nu13051585.
[14]
Hao W, Hao X, Yang C. Design and optimization of urinary real-time nursing model based on medical Internet of Things[J]. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2022, 2022: 7067856.DOI: 10.1155/2022/7067856.
[15]
刘文斌, 荚卫东. 《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)》解读[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 468-472.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4761.2020.06.020.
[16]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会. 肝胆胰外科术后加速康复专家共识(2015版)[J/OL]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(4): 220-225.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7402.2016.04.002.
[17]
中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 1-20.
[18]
华红霞, 卞丽, 王燕娜, 等. “互联网+” 联合多维支持护理在改善晚期肝癌患者生活质量中的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2023, 42(1): 174-178.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20220216-00044.
[19]
Liao Y, Yang Y, Pan D, et al. HSP90α mediates sorafenib resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma by necroptosis inhibition under hypoxia[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(2): 243.DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020243.
[20]
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6): 630-641.DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.
[21]
赵媛, 彭贵凌. 加速康复外科理念下信息化延续护理在老年髋部脆性骨折患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021, 27(8): 1000-1005.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200521-03485.
[22]
王艳晖, 岳仙, 郑瑞双, 等. 快速康复外科理念下出院准备管理方案在肝癌术后患者中的应用[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022, 37(24): 2267-2271.DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2022.24.014.
[23]
冯向英, 张平, 聂煌, 等. 加速康复外科在我国胃肠外科应用现况的认知和态度调查[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(7): 621-624.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220413-00145.
[24]
Xie QY, Yang J, Lei ZH, et al. Exploring the application of a multi-targeted nursing group for enhanced recovery after surgery using the LEER ("less pain", "early movement", "early return to a normal diet"and "reassurance") model[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2021, 14: 7187-7196.DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S329837.
[25]
Oodit R, Biccard BM, Panieri E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective abdominal and pelvic surgery at primary and secondary hospitals in low-middle-income countries (LMIC's): enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendation[J].World J Surg, 2022, 46(8): 1826-1843.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06587-w.
[26]
Li C, Liu J, Qian G, et al. Double chain system for online and offline medical data sharing via private and consortium blockchain: a system design study[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 1012202.DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1012202.
[27]
兰美娟, 徐彩娟, 韩娜菲, 等. 护士主导加速康复外科临床路径信息化系统的构建与实践[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(11): 1601-1605.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.11.001.
[28]
薛佳佳, 徐敏, 马莲, 等. 基于“互联网+”的循序渐进式康复护理模式对假体隆乳术就医者术后康复的影响[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(12): 180-183.DOI: 10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006063.
[29]
Cao R, Song X, Chen X. Research progress of the application of “Internet+” nursing in patients with liver cancer[J]. J Clin Nurs Res, 2023, 7(2): 59-64.DOI: 10.26689/jcnr.v7i2.4779.
[30]
张英琴, 刘慧, 林晓霞. 加速康复外科理念对原发性肝癌患者围术期NRS评分及肝功能的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1096-1100.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20201008-00270.
[1] 徐一航, 彭丽婷, 林嘉谊, 曹清华, 汪跃锋, 陈丽丽, 廖冰. 结构化病理报告对肝细胞癌手术病理报告质量的影响:一项回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 30-34.
[2] 方郁晖, 常钰泉, 何坤. 伴微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌术后辅助介入治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 53-59.
[3] 罗晓睿, 孔琪, 司仙科. 腹壁疝的全周期管理进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 112-117.
[4] 崔梦玲, 孙文梅, 赵睿敏, 王家平. 合并微血管侵犯肝癌术后TACE联合治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 160-166.
[5] 东小鸽, 樊海宁, 侯立朝, 杜凯豪, 刘海刚, 汪占金, 薛伟伟, 石亚超, 魏六木, 王展. 三维可视化技术、ICG荧光示踪和术中实时超声在肝癌个性化精准诊疗中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 181-189.
[6] 吴杰嵘, 严庆, 胡健垣, 陈焕伟. 复发性肝细胞癌再次手术切除与射频消融临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 211-218.
[7] 唐玥, 陈家璐, 覃德龙, 李宗龙, 汤朝晖, 全志伟. 基于AI的多模态影像在肝癌诊治中应用及面临挑战[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 4-9.
[8] 杨宇尘, 陈拥军. 三维可视化技术在肝癌转化治疗辅助决策中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 10-15.
[9] 刘建平, 姚灿开. 肝癌转化治疗策略选择和手术时机[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 16-20.
[10] 尹鹏飞, 吴堃, 王槐志, 蔡磊. 肝癌免疫治疗策略及其在围手术期中应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 21-27.
[11] 张龙, 徐伟, 孙善柯, 李文柱, 李俊达, 池涌泉, 宋进华, 王学浩, 成峰, 饶建华. 载药微球经动脉栓塞化疗在巨块型肝癌转化治疗中的疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 28-35.
[12] 戴宗伯, 张城硕, 郭庭维, 何知远, 赵昊宇, 张宇慈, 张佳林. 基于MRI影像组学机器学习构建肝细胞癌微血管侵犯预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 36-44.
[13] 何泰霖, 王峻峰, 田林云, 王罡, 杨超, 王海峰. 基于CT影像组学构建肝细胞癌微血管侵犯预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 45-52.
[14] 钟文卿, 韩冰. 基于术前CT影像数据构建肝癌患者生存期Nomogram预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 53-58.
[15] 沈宏年, 陆含笑, 张硕, 姜东林, 向文, 项洁, 杨军. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关肝癌的临床诊治单中心分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 95-100.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?