切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (05) : 315 -318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.05.011

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

术前CA19-9预测HBV相关性肝细胞癌R0切除术后复发的价值
刘涛1, 吴力群2,()   
  1. 1. 266003 青岛大学医学院附属医院肝胆外科(现在山东省菏泽市立医院肝胆外科)
    2. 266003 青岛大学医学院附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-26 出版日期:2016-10-10
  • 通信作者: 吴力群

Value of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in predicting recurrence of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after R0 resection

Tao Liu1, Liqun Wu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2016-05-26 Published:2016-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Liqun Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Liqun, Email:
引用本文:

刘涛, 吴力群. 术前CA19-9预测HBV相关性肝细胞癌R0切除术后复发的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(05): 315-318.

Tao Liu, Liqun Wu. Value of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in predicting recurrence of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after R0 resection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(05): 315-318.

目的

探讨术前血清CA19-9预测HBV相关性肝细胞癌(肝癌)R0切除术后复发的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2002年1月至2012年12月在青岛大学医学院附属医院实施R0切除术的554例HBV相关性肝癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男470例,女84例;年龄17~82岁,中位年龄55岁。根据随访结果,绘制术前血清CA19-9预测肝癌术后复发的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定CA19-9界值。根据CA19-9界值将患者分为CA19-9升高组和CA19-9正常组。两组生存率比较采用Z检验。

结果

CA19-9预测肝癌术后复发界值22.2 kU/L,CA19-9升高组258例,正常组296例。CA19-9升高组和正常组中位无病生存时间分别为30.0、49.5个月,1、2、3、4、5、10年无病生存率分别为78.1%、57.0%、46.8%、44.6%、33.2%、16.9%和74.7%、61.1%、55.3%、54.4%、46.8%、38.7%,两组4、5、10年无病生存率比较差异有统计学意义(Z=5.315,7.107,11.444;P<0.05)。

结论

术前血清CA19-9是预测HBV相关性肝癌R0切除术后远期复发的指标。

Objective

To investigate the value of preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 in predicting the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after R0 resection.

Methods

Clinical data of 544 patients with HBV related HCC undergoing R0 resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College from January 2002 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. There were 470 males and 84 females, aged from 17 to 82 years old with a median age of 55 years old. According to the follow-up results, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of preoperative serum CA19-9 predicting the postoperative recurrence of HCC was drawn and the cut-off point of CA19-9 was determined. The patients were divided into the CA19-9 increasing group and CA19-9 normal group according to the cut-off point of CA19-9. The survival rates of two groups were compared by Z test.

Results

The cut-off point of CA19-9 predicting the postoperative recurrence of HCC was 22.2 kU/L, by which 258 cases were assigned in the CA19-9 increasing group and 296 cases in the CA19-9 normal group. The median disease free survival (DFS) time in the CA19-9 increasing group and CA19-9 normal group was respectively 30.0 and 49.5 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 10-year DFS rates were respectively 78.1%, 57.0%, 46.8%, 44.6%, 33.2%, 16.9% and 74.7%, 61.1%, 55.3%, 54.4%, 46.8%, 38.7% , and significant differences were observed between two groups in the 4-, 5- and 10-year DFS rates(Z=5.315, 7.107, 11.444; P<0.05).

Conclusion

Preoperative serum CA19-9 is an index for predicting the long-term recurrence of HBV related HCC after R0 resection.

图1 术前血清CA19-9预测肝癌术后复发的ROC曲线
表1 CA19-9升高组和正常组HBV相关性肝癌患者无病生存率比较(%)
[1]
Bosch FX, Ribes J, Cléries R, et al. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2005, 9(2): 191-211.
[2]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822): 1245-1255.
[3]
Taketomi A, Kitagawa D, Itoh S, et al. Trends in morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: an institute's experience with 625 patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 204(4):580-587.
[4]
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(11): 693-699.
[5]
Zhou H, Wang H, Zhou D, et al. Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma may hold common disease process for carcinogenesis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2010, 46(6): 1056-1061.
[6]
Chen JG, Zhang SW. Liver cancer epidemic in China: past, present and future[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2011, 21(1): 59-69.
[7]
Koprowski H, Steplewski Z, Mitchell K, et al. Colorectal carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies[J]. Somatic Cell Genet, 1979, 5(6): 957-971.
[8]
聂凯,薛小军,张文华,等.血清CEA、CA19-9联合检测在肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌诊断中的价值[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2015,4(4):215-217.
[9]
Blechacz B, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Hepatology, 2008, 48(1): 308-321.
[10]
Paganuzzi M, Onetto M, Marroni P, et al. CA 19-9 and CA 50 in benign and malignant pancreatic and biliary diseases[J]. Cancer, 1988, 61(10): 2100-2108.
[11]
Petrick JL, Braunlin M, Laversanne M, et al. International trends in liver cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype, 1978-2007[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30211[Epub ahead of print].
[12]
Chan HL, Sung JJ. Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2006, 26(2): 153-161.
[13]
Li J, Zhou J, Yang PH, et al. Nomograms for survival prediction in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatitis B virus related early stage hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2016(62): 86-95.
[14]
余剑英, 黄柏英.血清CA125、CA199对肝硬化和肝癌的诊断价值[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(2): 266-267.
[15]
郭红梅.血清CA199在肝硬化与肝癌诊断中的价值[J].放射免疫学杂志,2003,16(4): 207-208.
[16]
谭政良,雷萌.肝病患者血清糖类抗原CA199化学发光法检测的临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志,2003,13(10):67-68.
[17]
Yu L, Zhang BF, Cheng ML, et al. Quantitative assessment of mutations in hepatitis B virus genome with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma development[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.9417[Epub ahead of print].
[18]
Wilson EM, Tang L, Kottilil S. Eradication strategies for chronic hepatitis B infection[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2016, 62 Suppl 4: S318-325.
[19]
Tarao K, Rino Y, Takemiya S, et al. Close association between high serum ALT and more rapid recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatectomized patients with HCV-associated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Intervirology, 2000, 43(1): 20-26.
[20]
Liaw YF, Leung N, Guan R, et al. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update[J]. Liver Int, 2005, 25(3): 472-489.
[21]
Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, et al. The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19-9 and CEA[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 1998, 35 (Pt 1): 99-103.
[1] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[2] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[3] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[4] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[5] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[6] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[7] 陈安, 冯娟, 杨振宇, 杜锡林, 柏强善, 阴继凯, 臧莉, 鲁建国. 基于生物信息学分析CCN4在肝细胞癌中表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 702-707.
[8] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[9] 吴晨瑞, 廖锐, 贺强, 潘龙, 黄平, 曹洪祥, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄俊杰, 孙睿锐. MDT模式下肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗肝细胞癌多处转移一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 713-716.
[10] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[11] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
[12] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[13] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[14] 张海涛, 贾哲, 马超, 张其坤, 武聚山, 郭庆良, 曾道炳, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 手术切除与射频消融治疗血管周围型单发小肝癌临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 523-527.
[15] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
阅读次数
全文


摘要